» What: EngageSA—Civic Engagement Government Transparency panel discussion
» When: 6-8 p.m. Wednesday, April 3
» Where: Dorćol Distilling + Brewing Co., 1902 S. Flores St.
» Cost: Free
» Visit the Facebook event page
When city officials and the City Council craft and approve policy, respectfully, such as revisions to the downtown housing incentive program or the Alamo master plan, how well does it include its own people in the decision making process?
In January, the council adopted its public participation guiding principles. What are they, why are they needed and how can they be improved upon?
On Wednesday, we’ll address these questions and others related to San Antonio’s efforts to improve public participation and to make its government more transparent.
We’ve invited District 7 Councilwoman Ana Sandoval, who authored the recently-approved principles; Cynthia Spielman, a member of the Tier 1 Neighborhood Coalition steering committee; and Jeff Coyle, government and public affairs director of the City of San Antonio. Heron editor Ben Olivo will moderate.
In a recent interview, Sandoval talked about repairing the lack of trust between many San Antonians and the city government.
“To have a better product in the end you have to really believe that the public has something that’s going to make this better,” Sandoval said. “They have a unique … insight that you as a policymaker may not have.”
Spielman, who helped form the Tier 1 Neighborhood Coalition three years ago because some downtown neighborhoods felt they were being excluded from the SA Tomorrow Comprehensive Plan process, called the principles a great start, but still had some issues with them.
“It’s particularly gratifying that there’s recognition that we’ve been lagging in public participation,” Spielman said. The set of principles “does not answer what they do with the info once they get it. And it doesn’t talk to the problem … neighborhood associations, coalitions and community groups have no seat at the actual decision making table—that wouldn’t be horrible except developers do.”
Coyle said there’s been an evolution from the city in its outreach strategy—from hosting strictly town hall-type meetings to a mix of town halls and going to where people congregate in their everyday lives.
“We want to get the average San Antonian who never even thinks about going to a public meeting,” Coyle said.
This is the first in the EngageSA series, three civically-minded public discussions hosted by the Heron and Dorćol Distilling + Brewing Co.
Here’s the rest of the series; all events are 6-8 p.m. at Dorcol.
» Wednesday, April 10
Digital Inclusion—Internet connectivity in San Antonio has a long way to go
With Jordana Barton, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas; DeAnne Cuellar, state director of Older Adults Technology Services; Munirih Jester, ConnectHome coordinator, San Antonio Housing Authority; Craig Hopkins, chief technology officer, City of San Antonio. Hosted by Maria Luisa Cesar, Greater Good Stories.
» Wednesday, April 17
Property Appraisals—Why do property values continue to skyrocket in some downtown San Antonio neighborhoods?
With Michael Amezquita, Chief Appraiser, Bexar County Appraisal District; Olivo will moderate
Contact Ben Olivo: 210-421-3932 | ben@saheron.com | @rbolivo on Twitter
I think this is great! But why not livestream them, too, for people who can’t be there physically? Facebook live is free. The city has cameras. At the very least work with TPR to put them on the radio. If they’re trying to be inclusive, then use all formats. Thanks!
I think it’s laughable that Ms. Sandoval is making herself the face of this transparency push when during her own campaign she actively pandered to D7 residents in the northwest by signing a petition against an issue that she promptly flipped and supported once elected.
Additionally, the resolution states that the city “treat every input provided by the public as another step toward a more engaged community.” How is that to be accomplished with the D8 councilman implies that those who take the time to be engaged but disagree with him are racists? And what does it say about Ms. Sandoval, who was fully aware of the community’s viewpoints and weeks later quietly acknowledged Mr Pelaez’s error, sat quietly as her colleague demonized her fellow residents.
The voters voted out Mr. Medina for not listening to the residents in hopes that Ms. Sandoval would be different but we appear to be mistaken.